Were it gets interesting is when we consider the r9 290x as well though, currently it actually sells for less for a sapphire card. Recently bought 2x msi r9 390 and use brother utilities. This feature is something i should be ignored. Central unit is also delivers good margin in mind. In this video we are dealing with power circuit repair on r9 390x. Radeon r9 390 sapphire nitro 8gb edition is a special edition of amd's high-end radeon r9 390, created by sapphire.
So I’m going to be looking at laptops with Carrizo APUs, and even laptops with Carrizo APUs combined with an AMD discrete mobile GPUs, as once sufficient Blender rendering can be done on the GPU(Ray Tracing included) there will be no need for an expensive quad core i7 based laptop for Blender 3d laptop based usage and medium graphics workloads.Download Now SAPPHIRE NITRO R9 390 DRIVER
I know from a mesh modeling standpoint that AMD’s, and Nvidia’s, GPUs handle high resolution mesh models/scenes much better than Intel’s limited SP/other execution unit count GPU/SOC SKUs. Blender 3d is getting support for the latest AMD graphics GCN hardware, so Cycles rendering on the GPU support will make a Carrizo based laptops more attractive for Blender rendering on AMD APUs.
AMD does more engineering hanging on by a thread just to stay in business, than anyone in the history of the PC market.įury is to market, and Zen is incoming, there are some Carrizo based laptops being offered, they better get some better screen resolution options, or we’ll know the fix was in from a certain CPU/SOC monopoly! AMD’s pricing for its Fury line is definitely more competitive for damn sure, and for the consumer that is one good thing. Give AMD time to compete with the limited funds/resources that they have both with GPU, and CPU engineering, AMD is doing a great job with the little R&D budgets that they have! If there were a year to year innovation for the dollar spent on R&D price metric, on what was done with the budgets available, AMD would be the winner in that category. AMD has offered some improvements on its older microarchitectures, and it will take some time for the Fury technology to work its way down the product stack. AMD does not have the revenues to rework its entire product stack top to bottom in a single stroke. Well AMD gave the market its new Fury, and spent its limited engineering budget on getting a new competitive performance SKU out there, and performing with 4GB of memory. Lacking the available bandwidth to fully support until the arrival of HDMI 2.0, the latest crop of 4K TVs such as the Sony XBR 55X900A and Samsung UE40HU6900 have implemented what amounts to a lower image quality mode that allows for a signal to fit within HDMI 1.4’s 8.16Gbps bandwidth limit.
This TV was manufactured before the chip SiI9777 was invented in 2014 So how it can play HDMI 2.0 how it can have HDCP 2.2 ? how it can have 18 gbps ? With out chip AND the can play with HDMI 1.4 only 30HZ 4k You bringing article on Sony’s XBR 55X900A this tv make in 2013 when he was only HDMI 1.4 This is very easy to prove with a simple detailed image for 4:4:4 and only a blind man cannot tell the different between 30 and 60hz on a PC.Īsk in written confirmation from NVIDIA video card that thay have :
This the card 980TI where the SiI9777 Chip ? ONLY Silicon Image make that chip for HDMI Organization To speak from video card to screen display or Blu-ray is a need to Chip in any device ” image quality mode that allows for a signal to fit within HDMI 1.4’s 8.16Gbps bandwidth limit. I obviously didn't test every game that users are playing today, but all indications are that AMD is in the clear. And that's all I wanted to make sure of with this testing today and this story. BF4 and Metro: LL are quite a bit longer in the tooth and thus the lack of change is expected.īut, there does not appear to be any kind of smoking gun to point to that would indicate AMD was purposefully attempting to improve its stance through driver manipulation. ( Note: the results at 4K testing, which I did run, showed identical behavior to the 2560×1440 testing shown above.) It makes sense that GTA V would see some improvement in gaming experience with a newer driver as it is still a new title getting updates and fixes from both AMD and NVIDIA. So what's the take away? While in Grand Theft Auto V there is some performance delta between Catalyst 15.5 and Catalyst 15.15 with the R9 290, that is not the case in Battlefield 4 or Metro: Last Light. The same is true for Metro: Last Light – performance is essentially identical between the new and older Catalyst beta driver on the Radeon R9 290.